Mental models

Codex Vitae v1.0

This Codex Vitae, or “book of life”, is a collection of my beliefs and concepts that inform my decisions and life. It is a work in constant flux; as my understanding changes, so will my beliefs. The main purpose of this document is to

  1. pull my (often normative) beliefs into the light where I can question them more effectively and

  2. to share philosophies, concepts, tools, and inspiration that have been helpful to me.

It's about making things explicit.

Read More

On scientific honesty in modelling

The argument is sometimes made that we have no choice; without a model we will end up relying on biased opinions, guesswork, or even worse. Thus we must develop the best models possible, and use them to evaluate alternative policies. In other words, working with even a highly imperfect model is better than having no model at all. That might be true if we were honest and upfront about the limitations of the model. But often we are not.

Models sometimes convey the impression that we know much more than we really do. They create a veneer of scientific legitimacy that can be used to bolster the argument for a particular policy. This is particularly the case for integrated assessment models (IAMs) which tend to be large and complicated, and are sometimes poorly documented. IAMs are typically made up of many equations, and the equations are hard to evaluate individually (especially given that they are often ad hoc and without a theoretical or empirical foundation), and even harder to understand in terms of their interactions as a complete system. In effect, the model is just a black box: we put in some assumptions about GHG emissions, discount rates, etc., and we get out some results about temperature change, damages, etc. And because the black box is “scientific,” we are supposed to take those results seriously and use them for policy analysis.

What mattered, however, was that these models required a computer to solve and simulate. The fact that some of the underlying relationships in the models were completely ad hoc and made little sense didn’t matter – the fact that they were computer models made them “scientific” and inspired a certain degree of trust.
— Robert Pindyck

Heuristics for the building of case studies

Heuristics for the building of case studies

The revolution in comparative politics started with a number of brave principles:

look beyond description to more theoretically relevant problems;
look beyond the single case to the comparison of many cases;
look beyond the formal institutions of government to political processes and political functions;
and look beyond the countries of Western Europe to the new nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Read More

Stocks and flows

I am a lover of grand narratives, ambitious stories that connect happenings across time and space, and that’s why I have named this blog ‘Connections’. Today, I will attempt to show you a powerful analogy, a mental exercise of sort, one that is able to provide a common framework to think about dynamic behaviour in biology, ecology, economics and much more. The mental construct that I will be writing about today is that of stocks and flows.

Read More